Author: sfoil Page 1 of 2

Cousin Joachim

Thomas Mann’s The Magic Mountain, however great its merits, has hardly been much regarded by anyone as a war novel, much less a military novel, despite the role of the First World War as both subtext and conclusion.  But it does offer a nuanced and even important portrayal of a soldier without a war or even an army, certainly without comrades.  I am talking, of course, of Cousin Joachim.

The Magic Mountain is a long book, and a book that needs to be long, but I’ll give a brief summary of the plot and setting.  In the early 20th century, a young German man named Hans Castorp visits his cousin, Joachim Ziemssen, at a tuberculosis sanatorium in the Swiss Alps.  His visit of three weeks becomes a stay of seven years.  Hans is the novel’s protagonist, and since Joachim’s character exists largely in contrast to Hans, the latter needs some description.

Hans is a bourgeois German orphan, raised by his uncle.  At the opening of the novel, Hans has recently become an accredited engineer, and has accepted an offer to start work at a shipbuilding firm when he returns from visiting his cousin.  Hans, however, has no real purpose in his life.  His inheritance, while not enough to live on respectably, insures him against the possibility of discomfort.  He regards his coming assumption of the identity of Marine Engineer with indifference if not positive uninterest.  His only passions are trivial vices, particularly his favorite brand of cigar.  He feels ill by the end of his intended stay; the sanatorium’s doctor delivers a diagnosis; Hans makes the fateful calculation that the proceeds of his inheritance will fund his stay indefinitely.  Hans really does have something, probably, although the doctor – who is also the director – is also running a business.  But nothing draws Hans back to the “flatland”, and he falls complacently into the rhythms of the sanatorium.

Hans’s cousin, Joachim, has chosen a military rather than technical career.  And his tuberculosis is an incontrovertible fact.  Just as Hans has accepted an offer but has not worked a day for his company, Joachim has taken some steps towards becoming an officer but has never actually served.  Both young men, it must be said, are “wanna-bes”.  But they differ in their attitude towards this status. 

Joachim is not completely immune to the lull of the Berghof sanatorium – he introduces Hans and the reader to the routine and subculture of the institution with the attitude of a veteran convalescent which he is – but he clearly identifies himself as a soldier and officer, and he with some aloofness refuses to allow himself to be totally submerged into the role of consumptive patient at the expense of this self-image.

Summaries of Joachim’s character speak of his sense of “duty”, and that is true, but the details of this sense are important.  Joachim is not simply “dutiful”, but a subscriber to youthful idealizations of military service.  He is, when we meet him, emphatically not an officer, not a real soldier, but he nevertheless maintains a military appearance and bearing which is repeatedly remarked upon not only the narrator but by other patients.  When the excitable and pompous Italian, Settembrini, addresses Hans as “Engineer” he is making Hans’s position in the world out to be somewhat more than it is in order to exaggerate the level of society in which Settembrini himself resides (as he probably exaggerates his own position in the world somewhat).  Hans complacently accepts this, as he does most everything else.  But when Settembrini calls Joachim lieutenant…he is doing the exact same thing, but anyone who has known or has been a cadet cannot call Joachim’s blushing decision to let the title stand an innocent indulgence.

The brute fact is that Joachim is a wannabe, even a poseur.  I want to be careful here, because antebellum Europe was a different world.  Ernst Junger said that anyone who did not know Europe before the Great War cannot grasp what was lost.  I am also reminded that the cadets at West Point started changing out of their uniforms to go into New York City during Vietnam; they have never resumed their old habits.  Still, I do not think that Joachim’s soldierly aspirations were any less sincere or desperate than those of similarly situated young men today, but perhaps some of the outward signs of his desperate sincerity were more indulged by his society.  Whatever the attitudes of others however, Joachim is pretending in both the archaic and modern sense of the word.

Many of the Berghof’s residents are professional patients, and while some – including Hans – are malingering from the healthy world, for others medical necessity really does require their indefinite claustration.  Joachim resolves to return to the real world, the “flatlands” during the spring following Hans’s arrival, against the admittedly generally suspect advice of his doctor.  In nine months he accedes to the rank of full lieutenant and participates in the early-1900s equivalent of a CTC rotation.  And then his sickness returns.

Nine months he’s had his heart’s desire, and been living in a fool’s paradise.  Well, it wasn’t a snakeless paradise—it was infected, more’s the pity…He’s got as far as lieutenant, anyhow, there’s that to say.  But what’s the use of it?  The good Lord sees your heart, not the braid on your jacket, before Him we are all in our birthday suits, generals and common men alike…

So says the Berghof doctor.  Joachim himself returns to the sanatorium – implicitly as a terminal case.  And he does die there, facing death like “a soldier, and brave” as the chapter is named. 

I think that Joachim made the right decision, by the way, and I hope I would have acted the same way.  The hospital patient is a sort of inverse of the soldier.  I can think of abstract schema for thinking about this but ultimately the hospital is where the man who’s expected to bear arms ends up when he isn’t fit.  The reasons may be honorable, or otherwise, and anyone who has been in a military hospital knows full well both the distinction and the temptation to move from the one category into another.  (By the way, Catch-22 opens in a hospital for this reason.)    

What impressed me about Joachim’s story is how he must have appeared to those fortunate enough to serve without concern for their health.  An almost forgotten old classmate enters the unit behind the curve, serves well enough, but ultimately his health catches up to him and he leaves after a short period.  I have known real people like this, and pitied them.  But Joachim is not to be pitied.  He lived and died as a soldier; that he never heard a shot fired in anger does not take away from this.  There are others serving, now, who are in a similar position, who share their lot with soldiers in the past.  Those called to service must make the best of their lot and not regret having missed the show during their allotted time. 

Is there something about military service that promotes, or at least conduces, this sort of dedication?  Why can’t Hans feel the same way about being an engineer as Joachim does about being a soldier?  Hans is, obviously, not the same sort of man as Joachim but is that why he chose to become an engineer rather than an officer, or because of it?  To answer all of these questions, it is quite obvious that to enter military service is to be initiated into a new state of being.  If this sounds a little outré, consider for even a moment the importance placed on the “combatant-noncombatant distinction” in legal and moral conceptions of war. 

Could engineers become an initiatory caste like professional soldiers?  I don’t think it’s physically or socially impossible.  In such a world I suspect Hans would have chosen a different area of study.

Joachim’s death is not his last appearance in the novel; he makes an extraordinary postmortem appearance.  To appreciate the effect of this without actually going through the trouble of reading the book, understand that Mann write in a completely realist manner except in this very specific scene.  There is, it must be said, one other episode in which Hans, on the verge of perishing from hypothermia, hallucinates at some length, and this narratively prefigures the frankly supernatural event which occurs later.

The Berghof patients throughout the novel occupy themselves with various faddish distractions.  After years of Hans’s residence, one such fad is spiritualism.  After seven hundred pages of unrelenting realism, and after treating the newly arrived medium’s provenance with the same ambiguity as that of the doctor’s, Hans asks to see his cousin during a séance.  And

“now followed the most extraordinary hours of our hero’s young life…we may assume them to have been the most extraordinary he ever spent.”

For, after much ceremony, the playing of Gounod’s Faust opera and appeals to God Almighty, he Joachim appears to both Hans and his companions:

“[Hans] did not look up.  A bitter taste came in his mouth.  He heard another voice, a deep, cold voice, saying: ‘I’ve seen him a long time.’

The record had run off, with a last accord of horns.  But no one stopped the machine.  The needle went on scratching in the silence, as the disk whirred round.  Then Hans Castorp raised his head, and his eyes went, without searching, the right way.

There was one more person in the room than before.  There in the background, where the red rays lost themselves in gloom, so that the eye scarcely reached thither, between writing desk and screen, in the doctor’s consulting chair, where in the intermission Elly had been sitting, Joachim sat.  It was the Joachim of the last days, with hollow, shadowy cheeks, warrior’s beard, and full, curling lips.  He sat leaning back, one leg crossed over the other.  On his wasted face, shaded though it was by his head covering, was plainly seen the stamp of suffering, the expression of gravity and austerity which had beautified it.  Two folds stood on his brow, between the eyes, that lay deep in their bony cavities; but there was no change in the mildness of the great dark orbs…That ancient grievance of the outstanding ears was still to be seen under the head covering, his extraordinary head covering, which they could not make out.

Cousin Joachim was not in mufti.  His sabre seemed to be leaning against his leg, he held the handle, one thought to distinguish something like a pistol case on his belt.  But that was no proper uniform he wore.  No color, no decorations; it had a collar like a tunic jacket, and side pockets.  Somewhere low down on the breast was a cross.  His feet looked large, his legs very thin, they seemed to be bound or wound for the business of sport more than war.  And what was it, this head-gear?  It seemed as though Joachim had turned an army cook-pot upside down on his head, and fastened it under his chin with a band.  Yet it looked quite properly warlike, like an old-fashioned foot soldier, perhaps.”

Joachim’s momentary resurrection does not include rejuvenation; the description given of his bodily appearance is identical to the earlier description of his corpse.  And he has discarded his embroidered jacket for the uniform of the First World War: a drab pocketed tunic with an Iron Cross, puttees, steel helmet, and gas mask (“something like a pistol case on his belt”).  Perhaps Joachim, denied the opportunity he sought – not entirely knowingly — to suffer in this panoply in life, is granted it in death.

When the Great War breaks out, in ten pages Hans goes from the Berghof to the battlefield.  The book ends with his surviving an artillery bombardment; there will be others, and the Mann closes with the remark that his fate is not the subject of the novel – though “thy prospects are poor.”  The seven years’ progression of Hans’s development puts him right where his cousin started off.

The Green Goblin

Chartreuse is a green-tinted herbal liqueur made by the Carthusian Order (there is also a yellow variety of the liqueur available). The Carthusians arguably have the strictest monastic rule of any holy order in existence. The recipe for the liqueur is of course a secret, and one that has proven resistant to several attempts at emulation and that has survived several suppressions of the Order in France. The liqueur’s intense herbal flavor, which I would characterize in one word as “dank”, easily overpowers its strong 110 proof alcohol content. This is all well and good. But how can we use it to mix cocktails?

The most popular Chartreuse cocktails are variations on the Last Word. This is an excellent drink and rand I recommend it if you have the necessary ingredients on hand.

Chartreuse’s vegetable taste seemed a natural ingredient to a cream cocktail, which gives the drink a mouthfeel to match the complex blend of flavors in the liqueur. I found Chartreuse to be rather like vermouth — it’s easy to ruin a drink with too much of it, but you can always add a splash more if you skimped when mixing. If you’re only a postulant regarding the liqueur — likely given its exotic taste and price tag — keep this in mind when mixing these or any other recipes. You might only want to use half measures when starting out.

After failed attempts to alter Alexander cocktails or use amaretto as an ingredient, I hit upon the sweet, one-note taste of creme de menthe as a suitable companion to Chartreuse’s herbal bouquet.

The Green Goblin

1 part cream

1 part creme de menthe (green)

.75 part Chartreuse (green)

Shake and serve straight up

The taste of mint is heavy up front, but the Chartreuse strongly dominates both the aroma and aftertaste. In general, I found Chartreuse to be effective at creating a strong “undertone” to drinks, as a tincture, rather than as a main ingredient. Again, rather similar to the way I use vermouth.

The “Green Goblin” recipe above immediately brought to mind the question: what if I just add it to a grasshopper cocktail? After all, chocolate liqueur is a quite versatile ingredient. Sure enough, it worked.

The Locust

1 part creme de menthe

1 part creme de cacao

1 part Chartreuse

1 part cream

Shake and serve straight up

The extra ingredient added a definite subtle complexity to this unsophisticated dessert cocktail. Between the two, I think it might be the better recipe — I’m certainly more proud of it.

After trying a recommendation from elsewhere to use Chartreuse in place of vermouth in a martini, I then tried my hand at using it in an Old Fashioned cocktail. And of course it worked.

Old Rule

1 part rye whiskey

.25 parts Chartreuse

1 dash orange bitters

Stir and serve on the rocks

Chartreuse is slightly sweetened, and so eliminates the need to add sugar from elsewhere, though a dash of syrup might be required for a real sweet tooth (though full warning Chartreuse might not be the best purchase for you if you prefer very sweet drinks). Angostura bitters don’t go well with Chartreuse I think, but you can hardly call a drink an old fashioned without some sort of bitters. Orange bitters it is then, but don’t go overboard.

I garnished all of these drinks with basil leaves as they go well with Chartreuse in appearance, aroma, and taste (undoubtedly they are one of the ingredients, though that’s not saying much).

Marine Force Design 2030

A few days ago, the Marine Corps released a progress report on their Force Design 2030 effort. The report describes itself as being “Phase II” of a four-phase plan, with Phase I being problem framing. This phase produced a number of recommendations which will be analyzed (Phase III) and then refined and implemented (Phase IV). Force Design 2030 describes how the USMC will organize and equip itself based on the US National Defense Strategy (NDS). The Commandant’s specific guidance is given on Page 3 of the linked document, but the general thrust of the redesign is de-prioritizing maneuver warfare and occupation (the defense establishment prefers the term “wide area security” for the latter, FYI) in favor of a littoral operations in support of maritime operations, especially in the “Indo-Pacific” i.e. against China.

The proposals in the document, while not final, are very sensible conclusions given the prioritization of littoral operations and the fact that

“We must acknowledge the impacts of proliferated precision long-range fires, mines, and other smart weapons, and seek innovative ways to overcome these threat capabilities.”

General David h. berger, commandant usmc

The overall major changes are a reduction in the number of infantry units with a concomitant reduction in support assets, the elimination of tanks and law enforcement battalions, and a drastic reduction of tube in favor of rocket artillery with anti-shipping missile apparently an important capability of the latter.

Infantry Reductions

The document calls for the elimination (“divestment”) of one regiment of three battalions of active duty infantry and the elimination of two battalions of reserve infantry (presumably one from each reserve regiment, and even more presumably the “24th Regiment” battalions). This resulted from removal of the requirement to field two Marine Expeditionary Units (MEUs) for joint forced entry i.e. a major conflict with a peer country. Infantry is, obviously, the core capability of the USMC and such reduction could not have been done lightly. Further, the size of current battalions might be shrunk somewhat.

If any of the proposed force reductions don’t stick through the analysis in Phase III, I would expect it to be this one. However, with focus moving away from maneuver warfare and occupation, and given the removal of the 2x MEU — the restoration of which would probably require an unforeseen budget increase — the most likely reason for needing more infantry that the Phase III analysis reveals higher than anticipated losses in likely scenarios. The document (correctly and appropriately) considers “attrition” inevitable in any serious conflict, so the planners have this problem in mind:

There is no avoiding attrition. In contingency operations against peer adversaries, we will lose aircraft, ships, ground tactical vehicles, and personnel. Force resilience – the ability of a force to absorb loss and continue to operate decisively – is critical.

This would probably affect the size rather than number of battalions, however. The current number of battalions is based on the 2x MEU requirement and won’t be kept without it.

Likewise, Force Design 2030 proposes a reduction in both lift aviation and assault amphibious units. Again, the current structure derives from the 2x MEU requirement, and eliminating it reduces the need for these assets.

Combat Aviation

Puzzling out the thinking behind FD2030 proposals regarding combat aviation is a little more difficult, which perhaps indicates that these proposals are more tentative. On the elimination of several attack helicopter squadrons it says that

While this capability has a certain amount of relevance
to crisis and contingency missions which we must still be
prepared to execute, it is operationally unsuitable for our
highest-priority maritime challenges and excess to our
needs with the divestment of three infantry battalions.

The AH-1Z’s limited range and station time, and vulnerability to low-altitude air defenses account for this “unsuitability”. Perhaps the USMC intends to replace its strike capability with more persistent (and expendable) UAS — FD2030 will double the number of Marine UAS squadrons — and less vulnerable surface fires, provided both by the Navy and by the greatly expanded rocket artillery capability.

And then there is the F-35. FD2030 proposes reducing the number of aircraft in each VMFA (fighter/attack squadron) to 10 without reducing the number of squadrons.

USMC F-35B lands vertically on USS America

Currently VMFAs operate either the F/A-18C, the F-35B, or the F-35C with 12, 16, or 10 aircraft each, respectively. FD2030 proposes that all of these squadrons operate 10 aircraft each. Why? The easy answer is money. But two other difficulties are mentioned. First,

I am not convinced that we have a clear understanding
yet of F-35 capacity requirements for the future
force. As a result, the Service will seek at least one external assessment of our Aviation Plan relative to NDS objectives and evolving naval and joint warfighting concepts.

usmc commandant

The F-35B is the most advanced STOVL aircraft in existence by a long shot, and has far greater capability than the AV-8 Harrier it replaces. The fleet carrier-based F-35C is probably a more incremental upgrade over the Super Hornet. Both aircraft are the expensive high-tech results of a lengthy development process, and the Marines are to some extent stuck with them whether they want them or not. Their capabilities and limitations compared to previous airframes are the most arcane input factors into FD2030, and the quoted section strongly suggests that the USMC planners simply could not determine (or at least agree) on how to use them without outside input.

The other problem, noted immediately afterward, is a shortage of pilots. This problem is not limited to the Marines. My understanding is that it is more an issue of retention than of recruitment (“FLY FIGHTER JETS” is not a hard sell to prospects, but reality of the lifestyle is apparently less attractive). Regardless, if the limiting factor is pilots rather than airframes — and, maybe, if the F-35 has a lower operational readiness rate than previous aircraft — it might make sense to lower the pilot:airframe ratio. This is assuming the USMC takes delivery of the same number of F-35Bs as currently planned, which I believe it will (must). On the other hand, is pilot retention really something that can’t be fixed in ten years?

Tanks & Howitzers (and cops)

FD2030 recommends a drastic reduction in Marine tube artillery, from 21 batteries to only five. The Marines use towed 155mm howitzers (M777 as far as I know). Increases in rocket artillery will compensate for this, as discussed below. I see this as a logical course of action for a service no longer concerned with maneuver warfare and occupation (no suppressing fires in support of maneuver, no “firebases”). The current structure of, more or less, one howitzer battery per infantry battalion is obviously being completely scrapped.

The complete elimination of Marine tanks is significant but unsurprising, and the right decision. The heavy, fuel-guzzling Abrams tank is frankly something the Marines were saddled with by Army requirements. The Abrams’ inability to swim probably accounts in no small part for the existence of the USMC’s bridging assets (which FD2030 proposes to eliminate). For an amphibious force which needs to carefully consider every ton of materiel moved ashore, the weight to capability ratio of the Abrams was always dubious.

Marine M1A1 in Helmand Province, 2011. Only the Marines have ever sent Abrams to Afghanistan. Photo by Sgt. Jesse Johnson

In the littoral/maritime environment emphasized by the Commandant, the Abrams would be an extremely niche capability. There’s a certain economy of scale to running tanks, like with most other things: if you have even one tank, you need an M88, specially trained mechanics, crew training programs, replacement parts, etc. (The USMC have also run their own independent Abrams development program rather than piggybacking on the Army, for budget reasons.) In the Marines, this has been done in the tank battalions, which don’t fight independently as the Army’s armored battalions have in the past but instead parcel out their tanks to expeditionary units, usually at the platoon level. If the USMC needs tanks for some particular mission in the future, they can do the same thing that JSOC does and borrow them from the regular Army.

FD2030 also proposes getting rid of the Law Enforcement Battalions. Sure.

Rocket Artillery and Anti-Ship Missiles

FD2030 recommends adding 14 additional rocket artillery batteries. The document mentions the “finders and hiders” problem in the context of proliferated long-range precision munitions (roughly the same thing as what I think of as the “sensors and dispensers” mode of warfare). The maxim of this problem is: if it can be seen it can be hit; if it can be hit, it can be killed. So: don’t be seen. Rocket artillery, presumably using mostly guided munitions, offer superior range and single-munition payload to howitzers. However, there is another, more intriguing aspect to the USMC’s bet on rocket artillery: shore-launcher anti-ship missiles (ASM). Whatever the relative merits of cannon cockers vs rocket jockeys, it is the anti-ship capability that appears to drive this proposal:

This investment [rocket artillery] provides the basis, over time, for generating one of the fundamental requirements for deterrence, and ultimately successful naval campaigns – long-range, precision expeditionary anti-ship missile
fires. This requirement is based on one of the more well-supported conclusions from wargaming analysis conducted to date.

This is a very new direction for both the Marines and the US in general. The Navy, for instance, has resolutely held on to the aging Harpoon ASM even as competitors developed several iterations of more capable missiles. As far as I know, the US has never fielded shore-based anti-ship missiles outside of test ranges, although they have provided them to other countries.

AGM-158C LRASM next to an F/A-18E at a Navy test facility.

Clearly the Marines & Navy want shore-based missiles to defend forward bases without having to completely rely on seagoing vessels. Development of the AGM-158C LRASM and some other capabilities has made this clear for some time. More interesting is the idea of Marine detachments being quickly deployed onto coastlines and islands in order to contribute land-based ASM launches to naval surface warfare plans. FD2030 also recommends expanding air-defense capabilities, which would support both of these activities. I would expect to see future fleet exercise incorporate these tactics for evaluation, since FD2030 sounds very confident about the simulation/wargame results. Indeed there have already been some rapid deployment exercises of Marine HIMARS in the Pacific.

Army HIMARS firing during an exercise in Poland.

Unmanned Systems

As mentioned above, the FD2030 recommends doubling the number of UAS squadrons in the USMC. The document refers to these as being either for “collection” or “lethal” activities — intelligence and attack. However, Gen. Berger also wrote that

I am not confident that we have identified the additional structure required to provide the tactical maneuver and logistical sustainment needed to execute [operations] in contested littoral environments against our pacing threat [i.e. China]. While not an afterthought by any means, I do not believe our Phase I and II efforts gave logistics sufficient attention. Resolving these two areas must be a priority for Phase III.

I suspect, but it is only a suspicion, that the Marines may be looking into the possibility of using unmanned or at least heavily automated systems for at least some ship-to-shore logistics. This would be an even bigger innovation than developing a coastal ASM capability (which plenty of other militaries have already done). I do not think that land logistics will prove particularly amenable to this sort of automation (basically, there is a trend of lines of communication requiring more and more security) but this may not apply to amphibious movement.

Conclusions

Force Design 2030 indicates that the Marines have a coherent general vision of what sort of conflict they want to prepare for (Pacific, maritime/littoral) and are taking reasonable steps to restructure their force to fight for this conflict. They are eliminating redundant capacity with the Army, adding new capability suited to the intended fight, and modestly reducing the overall size of their force in expectation of only having to fight one major conflict at a time.

Update

I’ve migrated both sfoil and mfoil over from wordpress.com to a self-hosted site, sfoil.net. I haven’t updated either blog since October 2019. I needed to complete a major project in my waking life which is now accomplished, and when I did have time to write it was fiction for a real-life writing group. Although I don’t consider the pseudonym I use here to be much more than a form plausible deniability, I still wouldn’t have and don’t now want to post anything which could be too easily cross-referenced to my real identity, as that material would have been had I published it here. I won’t commit myself to any serious schedule but I am still alive and in need of at least an occasional outlet.

As for the decision to merge the two blogs, I would like to say it was financial, but in reality the cost of maintaining a separate domain name is rather trivial. When I set out, I wanted to keep my thoughts about military matters (srs bsnss) at least slightly separate from my “personal” thoughts, in order to preserve the respectability of the former. Well, aside from my relatively low post frequency, on examination I think that sort of respectability is rather a spook, as the kids say, quoting Max Stirner at third hand. My writing here is intended to be first and foremost a sketchpad of my thoughts which are incidentally available to others, and if those others have to put up with my pondering about the future of the Main Battle Tank being interspersed with cocktail recipes and anime reviews, well, how do you think I feel? At any rate I usually remember to set tags and categories on my posts.

I obviously reserve the right to change my mind about maintaining a separate page (though hypothetical apologies in advance to subscribers), although I don’t think that is too likely.

BLOOD OCEAN

The alien ocean in Solaris remains beyond human understanding at the end of the novel.  The ending of Neon Genesis Evangelion is also beyond understanding; this is not a coincidence.

vlcsnap-2018-06-05-16h38m29s107

Lem vs Lovecraft on Aliens Beyond Our Ken

Like many SF readers, I’ve read HP Lovecraft’s short fiction.  Like many Lovecraft readers, I’m fascinated by his grasping portrayals of cosmic beings beyond the ken of man’s understanding but still left a bit wanting by his various idiosyncrasies, stylistic and otherwise.  Fortunately, Lovecraft isn’t the last word on unknowable alien beings; for my part, I’ve found the Polish writer Stanislaw Lem to exceed Lovecraft in their portrayal.

I’ve read several of Lem’s books, but two of them in particular concern the subject under discussion: His Master’s Voice (1968) and Solaris (1961).  In His Master’s Voice, government scientists attempt to decode a message from a distant star.  In Solaris, a living ocean on another planet causes strange phenomena aboard a research station.

The “Cream Fizz”

0523181605

Reading the Savoy Cocktail Book several years ago, I encountered a mysterious recipe for a so-called “Cream Fizz”.  The recipe is as follows (p. 194):

The Juice of 1/2 Lemon

1/2 Tablespoonful Powdered Sugar

1 Glass Dry Gin

1 Teaspoonful Fresh Cream

Shake, strain into medium glass, and fill with soda water.

Now, adding lemon juice to milk causes it to curdle.  An old substitute for buttermilk, in fact, is lemon juice + whole milk.  Still, I gave this a try.  The result was…not appetizing.  I don’t know how common this alleged cocktail was back in the Savoy, but I can’t imagine it was popular.  However, after encountering a non-alcoholic drink recipe called the “Thai Daisy” combining lime juice and coconut milk while looking to find uses for orgeat syrup, I became intrigued by the possibility of using coconut cream to make citrus cream cocktails that didn’t curdle.  Despite making a mental note, it was some months before I got around to doing it.  When making a coconut milk curry for dinner, however, I had the presence of mind to reach into the liquor cabinet before I dumped the milk in.  Here is the recipe I used:

3 oz Dry Gin

1.5 oz Fresh Lemon Juice

3 oz Coconut Milk

1 Tbsp Powdered Sugar

Shake and dump into a highball glass, top with soda water.

The results were quite satisfactory.  Unfortunately I drank it rather than take a picture [update: I made another one, see picture].  1 oz simple syrup would probably substitute for the sugar.  Also, make sure the coconut milk is well mixed/shaken unless you don’t mind chunks of coconut cream floating around.

Count to the Eschaton

Science fiction author John C. Wright released the sixth and final book in his Count to the Eschaton series, Count to Infinity, in December.  Mr. Wright is one of the few contemporary SF writers I follow, and I haven’t seen much discussion of it, so I’ll throw out my thoughts.  This astonishingly ambitious series has a few flaws, but it’s overall an incredible work and deserves much more publicity than it’s gotten.

Count to the Eschaton is a six-book series spanning from a post-apocalyptic future in the 23rd century until the end of the universe billions of years later.  This astronomical scale defines the series.  Stephen Baxter did something similar with his Xeelee books, although Wright exceeds Baxter’s creation in every way here.

Count to a Trillion _ John Harris

Cover art of the first book by John Harris

Dune and Star Wars

 

Did Dune influence Star Wars? Sure, but mostly superficially, and that entangled with Barsoom.

The most obvious similarity: Tattooine — Dune — desert planet.  And the inhabitants wearing clothes, at that.  On the other hand, Tattooine’s fauna more closely resemble Barsoom than Dune, and the sand skiffs in Return of the Jedi come dangerously close to an outright ripoff of Burroughs’ tales, even if the Sarlacc looks quite like a torpid sandworm. Then again, most of the original trilogy doesn’t take place in the desert, and it serves as a point of origin, a backwater village, rather than an exotic theater.

tatooine

The Evil Empire versus the Good Rebels is too archetypal to allow Dune credit for mere surface similarities — Lensman and other pulp space operas fit the bill much better as direct antecedents — but the Bene Gesserit show some promise as progenitors to the Jedi. Not much — the Bene Gesserit are mystics whose esoteric practices grant them real magic power, but they’re too explicitly feminine where the Jedi are implicitly masculine. Certainly the Jedi of A New Hope if not the original trilogy are too much the wandering monk type to display much similarity to the hierarchical and meddling Bene Gesserit. Aside from the eugenics program, the Jedi Order does act much more like the Bene Gesserit in the prequel trilogy: hierarchical, centralized, and intertwined with formal state authority.

Likewise, Luke Skywalker has more similarity to Paul Atreides than to John Carter. Carter is an older man, an experienced veteran and fighter right from the beginning of A Princess of Mars. Luke and Paul both come of age, initially fight to avenge their fathers, and gain power through mystical experience. But this is just the Hero’s Journey, not an influence of one upon the other. The Jedi mysticism that empowers Luke doesn’t bear much resemblance with the drug-induced visions, orgiastic ritual, and racial memory of Paul’s experience.

princessofmars

Luke starts out wanting to be John Carter, I think, though it’s not in the cards for him.

Once Luke journeys to Mos Eisley and prepares to leave Tatooine, we see what is at once the most subtle and most profound aspect of Dune’s influence: the breadth, depth, and strangeness of the universe. There aren’t any space aliens in Dune, but there’s a great deal of alien space. And what Frank Herbert does with his appendices and epigrams and litanies, George Lucas does with sight and sound. The politics and philosophy of Star Wars don’t really hold a candle to Dune, but it doesn’t matter. Film isn’t writing, and Lucas didn’t need all those words to build his universe. There were other science fiction universes around in in the mid-1970s, but none of them were as arresting as Dune. Maybe Dune didn’t need to exist for Lucas to make Star Wars, but Dune injected some seriousness and gravitas into an otherwise rather light pulp pastiche.

All of this makes me nervous about attempts to put Dune on camera. The previous Dune efforts were fiascos with some redeeming qualities.  Lucas built Star Wars from the ground up as both a popular and a cinematic universe. Dune isn’t just weirder and darker than Star Wars; it’s denser, and that density makes it great but putting it onto film either turns the depth to cruft or strips Herbert’s universe of its best aspects. Good luck on the next attempt, though.

Dune

With word that Denis Villeneuve is working on a new Dune movie, I thought I’d revisit Frank Herbert’s 1965 book.  I’ve read all six of the sequels as well, and read enough about the Brian Herbert/Kevin J. Anderson-authored postmortem books not to read them.  For this post however, I’ll try to stick to the original.

 

dune_1st Edition

The first-edition cover, with a “dark desert” motif

Page 1 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén